2 models · 1,100 observations · under measurement since 29 Jul

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Kyma serves all of these, so the availability, throughput and latency below are its own readings rather than anybody's marketing. What each creator publishes about its own model is further down, kept separate, and clearly theirs.

Measured by Kyma1,100 observationssince 29 Jul
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5

Anthropic

711 obs

since 1 Aug

210 from Kyma's own probe

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI

389 obs

since 29 Jul

264 from Kyma's own probe

Availability, and how much of it we can actually see

Successful observations divided by total observations over the last 30 days, counting Kyma's own probe and real customer requests the same way. Same method and same figures as /models.

kymaapi.com
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
98.7%
98.2%
97%98.0%100%

The tinted band is the measurement's own grain. It is 0.8 points wide, which is what three failed requests are worth in the thinnest sample on this page. One or two is what luck looks like, so a lead has to clear all three before this page will call it. Scale starts at 97%, not at zero, and dot size is the size of the sample behind the figure.

No winner here. Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Terra sit inside the band, so this measurement cannot separate them. The honest claim is that they are all up between 98.2 and 98.7%.

Anything inside the band is level with the leader as far as this measurement can tell. Anything left of it is genuinely behind.

Throughput

Median tokens per second, from one identical prompt sent to every model every six hours, so the only variable left between two rows is the model.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
21 tok/s
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
38 tok/s
Longer is better.

Latency

Median time to a complete response on that same fixed prompt. It moves with output length, so it is a reading on one prompt rather than a promise about yours.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
3.65 s
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
1.16 s
Shorter is better.
Price on Kyma

What a request costs today, per 1M tokens. A model on offer shows the rate you are actually charged and the date it returns to list.

FactAnthropicClaude Sonnet 5OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

Input

per 1M tokens

$2.70$1.34

Output

per 1M tokens

$13.50$8.039

Cached input

repeated prefixes

$0.27$0.134
Published by the creator

The specification each creator publishes for its own model, read straight from the catalogue Kyma serves from. Nothing in this block is a Kyma opinion.

FactAnthropicClaude Sonnet 5OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

Context window

tokens in one request

1M1.05M

Max output

ceiling on one response

128K8K

Accepts

Text, image, fileText, image

Tool calling

YesYes

Reasoning

YesYes

Vision input

YesYes

Weights

Closed
Closed

Below release precision

narrower than the creator shipped

Not establishedNot established

What this instrument does not measure

This page carries no benchmark scores, so it will not tell you which model is smarter. It tells you which is cheaper, which is faster, which stays up, and what each one accepts. For the quality question, run both on your own prompts: one key, one line changed, and the answer is about your work rather than someone else's test set.

Every model above runs on one key and one balance. $0.50 of free credit on signup, no card.Get API key

More comparisons